new casino games free_free login Open a free casino game_Welfare offer m88.com live casino

Fri, 17 Mar 2017 03:50:33 -0700

Quick update:

- the current static content for docs.scipy.org is about 2.7Gb. Some clean
can happen but probably not going below 1Gb.
- www.scipy.org is really small.

-- Didrik




On 16 March 2017 at 23:18, Robert T. McGibbon <rmcgi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have always put my docs on Amazon S3 (examples: http://mdtraj.org/1.8.0/
> , .http://msmbuilder.org/3.7.0/) For static webpages, you can't beat the
> cost, and there's a lot of tooling in the wild for uploading pages to S3.
>
> It might be an option to consider.
>
> -Robert
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:15:08 +0100, Didrik Pinte kirjoitti:
>> >> The advantage of something like github pages is that it's big enough
>> >> that it *does* have dedicated ops support.
>> >
>> > Agreed. One issue is that we are working with a lot of legacy. Github
>> > will more than likely be a great solution to host static web pages but
>> > the evaluation for the shift needs to get into all the funky legacy
>> > redirects/rewrites we have in place, etc. This is probably not a real
>> > issue for docs.scipy.org but would be for other services.
>>
>> IIRC, there's not that many of them, so in principle it could be possible
>> to cobble them with <meta> redirects.
>>
>> >> As long as we can fit under the 1 gig size limit then GH pages seems
>> >> like the best option so far... it's reliable, widely understood, and
>> >> all of the limits besides the 1 gig size are soft limits where they say
>> >> they'll work with us to figure things out.
>> >
>> > Another option would be to just host the content under S3 with
>> > Cloudfront.
>> > It will also be pretty simple as a setup, scale nicely and won't have
>> > much restrictions on sizing.
>>
>> Some minor-ish disadvantages of this are that it brings a new set of
>> credentials to manage, it will be somewhat less transparent, and the
>> tooling will be less familiar to people (eg release managers) who have to
>> deal with it.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Robert
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>


-- 
Didrik Pinte                                 +32 475 665 668
CTO                                            +44 1223 969515
Enthought Inc.                            dpi...@enthought.com
Scientific Computing Solutions   http://www.enthought.com

The information contained in this message is Enthought confidential & not
to be disseminated to outside parties without explicit prior approval from
sender.  This message is intended solely for the addressee(s), If you are
not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to