Welfare offer bethard bonus code_login bonus bet365 apk_free login royal panda chinese

Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:54:06 -0800

This one and the many others like it are fragile, relying on undefined 
behavior, and should be replaced by std::exchange.  Such a change was made in 
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/198755/webkit and we probably need many more 
like that, but we are getting away with relying on undefined behavior which 
works for us in most places.

> On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Chris Dumez <cdu...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:10 AM, Chris Dumez <cdu...@apple.com 
>> <free online bettingmailto:cdu...@apple.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 17, 2018, at 10:27 AM, Alex Christensen <achristen...@apple.com 
>>> <mailto:achristen...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Chris Dumez <cdu...@apple.com 
>>>>>>> <mailto:cdu...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As far as I know, our convention in WebKit so far for our types has 
>>>>>>> been that types getting moved-out are left in a valid ¡°empty¡± state.
>>> This is not necessarily true.  When we move out of an object to pass into a 
>>> function parameter, for example, the state of the moved-from object depends 
>>> on the behavior of the callee.  If the callee function uses the object, we 
>>> often have behavior that leaves the object in an ¡°empty¡± state of some 
>>> kind, but we are definitely relying on fragile undefined behavior when we 
>>> do so because changing the callee to not use the parameter changes the 
>>> state of the caller.  We should never assume that WTFMove or std::move 
>>> leaves the object in an empty state.  That is always a bug that needs to be 
>>> replaced by std::exchange.
>> 
>> Feel like we¡¯re taking about different things. I am talking about move 
>> constructors (and assignment operators), which have a well defined behavior 
>> in WebKit. And it seems you are talking about WTFMove(), which despite the 
>> name does not ¡°move¡± anything, it is merely a cast.
>> In the case you¡¯re talking about the caller does NOT call the move 
>> constructor, it merely does a cast so I do not think your comment 
>> invalidates my statement. Note that in my patch, I was nearly WTFMove()ing 
>> the data member and assigning it to a local variable right away, calling the 
>> move constructor.
> 
> Also note that may of us already rely on our move constructors¡¯ behavior, 
> just search for WTFMove(m_responseCompletionHandler) in:
> https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/236463/webkit 
> <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/236463/webkit>
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to