login bonus football prediction sites_Welfare offer betting tips sites_Welfare offer baseball betting software

Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:34:08 -0800

The name ¡°AtomicString¡± was inspired by the term of art, ¡°atom¡±, traditionally 
used in at least some programming language implementations for what I see now 
is often called interned strings. You¡¯ll see a mention of that term in the 
article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_interning in the context of ML 
along with some other terms used for this such as ¡°symbol¡±.

I¡¯ve gotten used to the name AtomicString over the years, but I wouldn¡¯t 
strongly object to changing it if other programmers are often confused by it¡¯s 
similarity to the term ¡°atomic operations¡±.

A mild objection I have to the term ¡°interned string¡± is that the term 
¡°interned¡± is not really a normal English word; I wasn¡¯t familiar with that 
jargon when we named AtomicString and I am still not entirely thrilled with it. 
I think that specific term comes from the LISP intern function and is familiar 
to programmers largely because of its use in Java, .NET, and some other modern 
programming languages and libraries; I had encountered the technique many times 
over the years without ever hearing the word ¡°interning¡± and don¡¯t find the 
jargon entirely logical.

Some people might suggest using the term ¡°flyweight string¡± instead 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyweight_pattern and I¡¯m not sure which I¡¯d 
prefer. Maybe there¡¯s another obvious name?

Apparently in Delphi¡¯s DWScript they called it ¡°unified string¡± 
https://www.delphitools.info/2013/06/17/string-unification/ but in the article 
I cited they are chided for not calling it an interned string.

¡ª Darin

PS: I do love loudly declaiming, ¡°Atomic string, the string of tomorrow!¡± but I 
can get over it.
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to