Welfare offer casino bonus_casino free bonus forum_Welfare offer my betway account

Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:48:40 -0800


> On Dec 19, 2018, at 9:41 PM, Chris Dumez <cdu...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Dec 19, 2018, at 9:17 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com 
>> <mailto:m...@apple.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 19, 2018, at 8:06 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org 
>>> <mailto:rn...@webkit.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 1:13 PM Simon Fraser <simon.fra...@apple.com 
>>> <mailto:simon.fra...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>> > On Dec 19, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@igalia.com 
>>> > <mailto:mcatanz...@igalia.com>> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Darin Adler <da...@apple.com 
>>> > <mailto:da...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>> >> I¡¯ve gotten used to the name AtomicString over the years, but I wouldn¡¯t 
>>> >> strongly object to changing it if other programmers are often confused 
>>> >> by it¡¯s similarity to the term ¡°atomic operations¡±.
>>> > 
>>> > Well there were two other developers in the thread Ryosuke linked to who 
>>> > made the exact same mistake as me, so I do think the current name is 
>>> > problematic. A change wouldn't need to be drastic, though. I think 
>>> > suggestions from the old thread like "StringAtom" or "AtomString" would 
>>> > be unproblematic. The problem is the specific word "atomic" carries an 
>>> > expectation that the object be safe to access concurrently across threads 
>>> > without locks; I think that expectation doesn't exist if not for the "ic" 
>>> > at the end.
>>> > 
>>> > FWIW I've only ever heard the "interned string" terminology prior to now.
>>> 
>>> SingletonString?
>>> UniquedString?
>>> 
>>> I do like UniquedString. That conveys what AtomicString really is. 
>>> SingletonString isn't so great since AtomicString table is still per thread.
>> 
>> So hard to pronounce though! Why not UniqueString? It¡¯s not quite as 
>> explicit but close enough. 
> 
> Wouldn¡¯t it be confusing to use UniqueString type for a string that is 
> *common* in order to save memory?
> 
> Personally, I like the AtomString proposal as it is close to the naming we 
> are used to and addresses the issue raised (atomic has a different meaning 
> with threading).

Or I also like ¡°AtomizedString¡±.

> Also, I had never heard of interned strings before.
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org <mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org>
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev 
> <https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev>
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
free online betting

Reply via email to